Thesis ledger
Dated forecasts and market interpretations with assessment criteria and subsequent outcomes. This records research, not portfolio performance.
Publication range: 2 Jul 2026 – 5 Nov 2026. Source: Hawk Thorne research record. Thesis descriptions retain the content recorded in the ledger.
Forecasts
25Claims about future events, assessed against a stated condition and time horizon.
- Held
- 14
- Broke
- 9
- Unresolved
- 0
- Awaiting assessment
- 2
Interpretations
134Assessments of current conditions. New evidence can sustain, revise or retire an interpretation. These do not contribute to forecast accuracy.
- Sustained
- 12
- Revised
- 26
- Retired
- 14
- Awaiting assessment
- 53
- Historical assessments
- 29
Assessment rules and forecast calibration
Since 27 July 2026, forecasts and interpretations follow separate assessment rules. Earlier interpretations graded against price thresholds remain in the history and are excluded from calibration.
Declared probabilities compared with assessed outcomes. Brier is the mean squared error; a lower score indicates less error within this sample. A small sample does not establish future forecasting accuracy.
Forecast calibration
scored forecasts: 23 · Brier: 0.248
The sample includes only resolved forecasts with a recorded probability. Interpretations and unresolved entries are excluded.
Leveraged funds' covering of the 2-year Treasury short in the week to 28 July 2026 reflects de-risking ahead of the 7 August payroll print, not a directional bet on Fed cuts, while the 10-year short's continued build and the futures-priced 42.3bp firmer 12-month path both argue the higher-yield thesis is still intact at the long end.
What would prove it wrong
If the Non-Farm Employment Change prints at or below 57,000 on 7 August 2026, the 2-year Treasury yield would fall back through 4.0%, confirming the front-end covering anticipated a softer labor read; if it prints at or above 85,000 with the 2-year yield holding above 4.0%, the covering was premature and the firmer path stands unchallenged.
Read analysis#How it settled
no DGS2 close below 4 through 2026-08-08
WIG-BANKI's five-session gain into 31 July prices further NBP easing, but the July projection round that would test this reading has not yet been published.
What would prove it wrong
The NBP's July projection round moves the return-to-target date to 2027 Q4 or later (versus the March round's mid-2027), or an identified alternative driver (fiscal, capital, single-name) explains the WIG-BANKI move instead of the rate-cut premise.
Read analysis#How it settled
chg_5s_pct for WIG-BANKI is -0.91% into 10 August versus WIG20 +0.69%, showing the five-session bank-sector gain the 3 August stance rested on has reversed rather than merely remaining untested by the projection round.
WTI's managed-money short has already covered to the bottom of its three-year range, leaving little room for further squeeze, while Brent's managed-money long sits at the 83rd percentile of its own three-year range and carries more room to unwind if the Iran de-escalation holds.
Read analysis#What would prove it wrong
If the COT report covering the week to 4 August shows Brent's managed-money net long being trimmed rather than extended, the exposure asymmetry described here narrows and the reading should be revised.
S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq Mini futures are unwinding stretched shorts into new highs while Russell 2000 futures keep adding to an already 90th-percentile-stretched short.
What would prove it wrong
If the next COT report shows Russell 2000 e-mini futures also beginning to cover their net short alongside continued S&P and Nasdaq covering, the cross-cap divergence read fails and this becomes a single, uniform short-covering rally.
Read analysis#How it settled
The 1 August thesis required continued short-covering in S&P and Nasdaq futures alongside a stretched Russell short; the 4 August COT report instead shows all three books, including Nasdaq and S&P, extending net shorts, the exact scenario the 1 August falsifier said would end the cross-cap divergence read.
WIG-BANKI's continued five-session gain into 31 July prices further NBP easing even as the July CPI print rebounded 0.8% month on month on fuel costs, a divergence the sector's valuations have not yet adjusted for.
What would prove it wrong
This reading would be overturned if the NBP's coming July projection round moves the return-to-target date to 2027 Q4 or later (versus the March round's mid-2027), or if an identified alternative driver (fiscal, capital, single-name) is shown to explain the WIG-BANKI move instead of the rate-cut premise.
Read analysis#How it settled
The record-setting WIG20/WIG20-wide rally on 3 Aug, spanning nearly all sectors, indicates a broad equity-momentum driver rather than a bank-sector-specific rate-cut premise, satisfying the falsifier's alternative-driver condition; the prior reading's dismissal of this as merely 'predating' the record failed to engage with the market-wide nature of the move.
Sterling's 30 July 2026 rally to 1.3442 is a broad dollar retreat (Dollar Index down to a 20-day low of 100.1) borrowing the pound's exchange rate as its vehicle, not a market pricing a more hawkish Bank of England despite Governor Bailey's own pushback on hike bets.
Read analysis#What would prove it wrong
If GBP/USD continues rising even as the US Dollar Index stabilizes or recovers off its 20-day low of 100.1, that would indicate the market is pricing UK-specific strength rather than a dollar-side move, undermining this reading.
The 2-year Treasury yield's stretch near the 98th percentile of its trailing year is being driven by Treasury issuance and cash-rebuild supply pressure, not by a genuinely hawkish repricing of the Fed's path, since futures price only 34bp of additional tightening over 12 months against a decelerating GDP print.
What would prove it wrong
If the next Treasury auctions see a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.4 or above, showing dealers absorbing supply without a yield concession, the supply-driven framing for the 2-year yield's stretch is undercut in favor of a demand or growth-driven explanation.
Read analysis#How it settled
The falsifier's stated break condition (bid-to-cover >=2.4) cannot be evaluated because no auction results appear in the pack, only upcoming auction dates of 25-27 Aug; the original reading over-specified a testable trigger without evidence available at filing.
The BIEC Labour Market Index's rise to 77.7 in July 2026 introduces a credit-quality risk to the WIG-BANKI rally that is independent of, and potentially in tension with, the rate-cut premise the 28 July 0.58% gain is pricing.
What would prove it wrong
This reading would be undercut if a subsequent BIEC or GUS unemployment print fails to confirm July's Labour Market Index signal, removing the credit-quality concern and leaving the original rate-cut story as the sole driver of WIG-BANKI.
Read analysis#How it settled
No fresh BIEC or GUS unemployment print has landed since 29 July to test the Labour Market Index's climb to 77.7, so that credit-quality reading stands as filed, while the CPI rebound adds a separate, unresolved test of the rate-cut premise itself.
WIG-BANKI's 1.39% rally on 27 July 2026 reflects a market read that RPP reassurance (Tyrowicz's no-repeat-of-2022 framing) outweighs the NBP's own March projection, which still expects CPI above the 3.5% upper band through end-2026 and is due for an upward revision in the coming July round.
What would prove it wrong
This reading would be overturned by evidence that the bank-equity rally was driven by something other than an inflation-path bet, for example if the July NBP projection round, once published, confirms only a modest upward revision consistent with the March path rather than the materially higher path the desk's data flags as expected, or if bank-specific factors (fiscal, capital, single-name news) are shown to explain the 27 July move instead.
Read analysis#How it settled
The referee is correct: as of filing, the July NBP projection had not been published and CPI flash data don't arrive until 30 July, so the reading's inflation-path bet was untestable against the specified falsifier; moreover the 28 July WIG-BANKI move (+0.58%, flat/mixed) fails to confirm continuation of the 27 July rally, undermining the original inference.
The 2-year Treasury yield's stretch near the 99.6th percentile of its trailing year remains a fiscal-issuance story, not a war-risk premium, confirmed by its failure to fall even as WTI crude gave back 4.96% over five sessions on fading Iran escalation risk.
What would prove it wrong
If the 2-year Treasury yield falls meaningfully below 4.31% in the sessions following the 28-29 July Treasury auctions and the 29 July Fed decision, the fiscal-supply framing for the front end fails.
Read analysis#How it settled
DGS2 closed below 4.31 on 2026-07-29 (close 4.22)
Brent's spec book keeps adding to a net long into the falling tape while WTI's short has already covered, leaving Brent's crowd the one carrying the risk if the Iran pause holds and the premium keeps draining.
What would prove it wrong
If US-Iran strikes resume and the pause breaks, letting the risk premium reassert, or Brent crude climbs back above 100.69 within the horizon, the de-escalation unwind read fails and the asymmetry view retires.
Read analysis#How it settled
The 27 July note claimed both legs of its 22 July falsifier had landed, but the pack contains no 29 July Crude Oil Inventories figure to confirm the build-leg, only the prior report's -7.2M draw carried forward ahead of the 5 August release; only the WTI short-covering leg, visible in the 28 July COT report, can be confirmed from this pack.
Polish bank equity faces a two-sided squeeze: a CIT and bank-tax burden already running at roughly 80% of 2025's full-year total after just six months, with talk of a further increase, converging with an NBP reference rate at 3.75% since 5 March 2026 that is compressing net interest margins from the other direction.
What would prove it wrong
If the discussed CIT increase fails to advance to a formal legislative draft in the coming weeks, or if the 30 July 2026 CPI flash print comes in meaningfully above the NBP's March projection path (already assuming inflation above the 3.5% upper band through end-2026) and forces a pause in further rate cuts, the margin side of the squeeze eases and the fiscal threat alone would need to prove out on its own to justify continued underperformance in WIG-BANKI.
Read analysis#How it settled
WIG-BANKI's 1.39% rally on 27 July directly reverses the underperformance thesis's premise of continued sector weakness, and the framing of Alior's write-down as a contained 'minor adjustment' undercuts the fiscal/margin squeeze narrative, even though the CPI flash falsifier itself has not yet triggered.